“The
Organized Preparation of the Famine” (433-470)
“Six-part Plan” (433-434)
1.
Grain
Collection
2.
Entire
Economy, even of “smallest peasant”
3.
Forbidden use of products of their labor
4. Commercial blockade
5. Passport System that confined peasantry
to their villages
See Also: “Passport System of the USSR” (458-465)
6.
Transportation Blockade—no one in; no one out.
7.
Conceal
Facts—campaign of dezinformatsia
“Anti-collective protestors same category as traitors” (441)
An especially critical factor in the ability of the peasantry to protest
Effectively, and a further example of the insidiousness of the ways in
which the law helped “legalize” their starvation.
“Guarding fields” (445-452, 581-83)
“List of Districts involved in
Commercial Blockade” (455-457)
“Molotov Orders Starvation” (469-470)
“Central Authorities [including Molotov] Witness Famine (488-494)
“Concealment of Grain and
Grindstones” (483-486)
See also: Encyclopedia of Ukraine
article about “Food Storage.”
“Mortal
Famine in the Ukrainian Village” (515-570)
“People and Horses” (516-526)
Includes regulations passed to save the lives of horses, rather than
people.
“Testimonies” (526-604)
Primary source descriptions of the Famine and its causes and effects.
“Wages and Prices of Food During the Famine” (561)
“Types of Eating Establishments” (565)
“Foraging for Food Locally in the Villages” (571-609)
“No Famine for Soviet Hogs” (573-574)
Collectivized farm hogs were fed. People ate the grain given to hogs for
feed.
“Buried
Alive” (585-587)
See also
page 20 of Woropay, Olexa. The
the Victims of the Famine of 1933.
“Poisoning” (605-606)
See also pages 3-4, The
Famine of 1933, by Olexa Woropay.
“Torgsin Stores” (606-610)
See also The Artificial Famine, 1932-1982, by Lesia Kot-Samp.
“The Suppression of the Effects of the Famine and the Strengthening of the
Collective Slave System” (681-710)
“Excerpts from Statements of Communist Party Policy Concerning the Famine”
(683-703)
“Russians Replace Unkrainian Hunger Victims”
(703-710)
The Soviet government brought in Russian settlers to repopulate those
villages
whose populations were decimated by the Famine. The work of these new
well-fed settlers accounts for increased production figures often used to
denigrate the amount of work accomplished earlier by starving peasants.
“Firing Squad Victims’ List”
(687-689)
Popovsky, Mark. The
Vavilov Affair. With a
foreword by Andrei Sakharov. Hamden,
Connecticut: Archon Books, 1983. viii + 216 pp. Portrait of Vavilov on
the front cover, Notes, Index. ISBN: 0208020357 (alk. paper); LCCN: 84-9342.
Popovsky explores the scientific side of Soviet agriculture of the time
period surrounding the Famine. Referring to Soviet Commissar for Agriculture,
Yakovlev,
he writes that Lysenko’s vernalization technique “be extended to
some 250,000 acres on state farms and to be applied extensively on the
collective farms” (59). Suspicions of kulak sabotage being responsible for the
failure of his technique, Lysenko charged, “The class enemy always remains an
enemy…” (66). The question of harvest
figures of the time has been a matter of some conjecture. Popovsky writes, “most people were
uninformed, because the true figures of the harvests in those years were kept
secret” (78). He continues:
Acadamician Konstantinov, supported Lisitsyn’s questions with hard figures. Citing
data from fifty-three plant-breeding stations in the Soviet Union that had
carried out the vernalization of wheat from 1932-1936, he reported that in half
the cases vernalization had slightly increased the yield, while in the other
half it had actually reduced it. To take such an agronomic process seriously,
he said, was to indulge in self-deception” (81).
Pidhainy, S. O., Editor-in-Chief, et al. The Black Deeds of the Kremlin: A White Book,
Vol.
Two. The Great Famine in Ukraine.
With an introduction by Charles J. Kersten. Detroit: The Globe Press; The Democratic
Organization of Ukrainians Fomerly Persecuted by the Soviet Regime in U.S.A. (DOBRUS);
the World Federation of Ukrainian Fomer Political Prisoners and Victims of the
Soviet Regime (FUP), 1955. xxv + 710 pp.
Editor’s Preface. Photostatic copies of Documents, Black-and-White
Photographic Illustrations, Charts. Endpapers comprised of a collage of four Chicago American newspaper articles.
National Library of Canada: 95019509X.
“Famine as a Political Weapon,” Petro Dolyna (5-135).
“Planning and Preparation of Famine” (29-66)
State Ownership of Livestock:
The law protected not only the physical untouchability
of kolkhoz-owned pigs, but even their nerves. A young collective farm
worker was given a ten-year term in jail
for ‘joking with a girl in a pigpen nearby, thereby
disturbing the peace of the collective hogs (32-33).
Subscription lists to Ukrainian magazines used to find Ukrainian
nationalists to be arrested (57)
Comparison with Famine of 1920’s Russia and China with Ukrainian Famine of
1932-33 (59-65)
International aid programs were drastically different in these earlier
Famines, and provides the researcher perspective into the feelings of those
suffering the 1932-33 Famine during which very little help from any quarter was
available to provide life-sustaining assistance.
“Organizing the Famine” (67-118)
Chart:
Comparison of Diet in Regions and Districts of Ukraine: “poppy, weeds,
crows, children, bark, carrion, offal, hedgehogs, anything’” (70-71).
Valuables taken to Torgsin store (84
Percent of Death by Famine (121)
“NKVD freight trains of corpses” (79)
Masquerade clothes to be returned (93-94)
This in reference to the clothing provided during the staged deceitful
performance of apparently well-fed persons shown to foreigners touring
Ukrainian cities in order to deceive them about the realities of the Famine.
Grain stores smouldering
“from internal combustion,” H. Hang (102)
Grain was improperly heaped in piles that were burning by internal
combustion. [See related Pravda
article (266-267)]
Guardtowers over crops, shooting of starving
trying to reach food (107-108)
Children were among those shot as they attempted
to reach food..
World Opinion (109-118)
Source List (134-135)
“The Great Famine in Ukraine in 1932-1933” by Ivan Dubynets, et al (141-710)
“Ivan Dubynets: A Memorial” (141)
“The Village ‘Active’ and the ‘Thousanders’”
(143-151)
Referring to the approximately
25,000 Party members sent from Moscow and Leningrad to enforce collectivization
and grain confiscations. Includes statistics from Pravda 24 January 1930.
“De-kurkulization and Deportation of the De-kurkulized” (153-204)
List of Families Sent to
Camps (172-175)
Photo-Documents:
“Orders Threatening Punishment for Betrayal of
Denouncers” (183)
“Snitches” were a legally protected group.
“Instruction of the Application of Terror Against
Farmers” (193)
“Threat for
Not Supplying Grain,” (196)
“Additional
Requisition of Grain,” (199, and 227, 352)
Some farmers were able to pay the initial tax, so an extra levy was applied
to break them completely.
“Order to
Control De-kurkulized Farmers,” (207)
“Kurkul Farm
Sold at Auction,” (213)
“Kurkul
Children Deprived of Education,” (221)
“Annihilating the Church
and Destruction of Religious Life” (205-236)
Includes world opinion and actions to support religion in the USSR, as well
as Metropolitan Alexei’s interview with the Soviet press in which he hid
the facts of the ongoing religious persecution.
“Owner’s Destruction of the Stock,”
(237-243)
“Salt Prices Escalate” (237)
Photo-Document:
“Order Forbidding Destruction of Livestock,” (241, 259)
“Ruin of Co-operative Trade and the Paralysis of the Distribution of
Consumer
Goods” (245-260).
Photo-Document:
Requisitioning of Seed” (248)
“Grain Collecting” (261-272)
“Pravda Notes Grain Confiscated Rottting” (266-267)
“All Sunflower Seed for the State,” (270)
“A Self-Imposed Tax for
Cultural Purposes,” (271)
An additional 50% of
regular farm tax
“Complete Collectivization and its Downfall” (273-290)
Photo-Documents:
“The Milk
and Livestock Requisitioned” (283)
“Compulsary Savings
Banks for Peasants” (285)
“A List of
the Dekulakized” (287)
“Retreat and Collapse of
Collectivization” (291-307)
Photo-Documents:
“Requisitioning
of Potatoes, Poultry, and Hay,” (297)
“Call to Arms Against the Kurkuls” (301)
“Reorganizing the Forces” (309-322)
“Order for the
Widespread Sale of Liquor” (316)
“The Return of the De-kurkulized Children”
(319-320)
“Saving Distribution; Trade and
Agricultural Industries” (323-342)
“Penalties for Irregular
Meat Supply” (327-328)
Quoted from Visti 12 February 1933
“Resolution of the
Council of People’s Commissars of Ukraine” (328-330)
Visti 21 June 1933
“Speculators and Black
Markets” (333-334)
“Gifts of Merchandise to Those Who Give All Their
Grain” (334-335)
“The Hide Industry” (340-342)
Shortages occurred in livestock products of hides and furs as well as a
result of the animals dying of neglect or eaten so entirely for food. Leather or fur clothing and shoes were
unavailable, and often removed from the dead victims of the Famine. Hunger was
so great that pieces of leather, shoes, and boots were eaten for the nutrient
value of the leather.
“Farmers Terrorized by Politcal and
Economical Campaigns” (343-374)
Photo-Document:
“The De-kurkulized Are Given Poorest Land” (345)
“All the Grain Seized,
None Left for Seed” (361-362)
Quoted from Visti 19 March 1932
Photo-Document:
“Ban on the Manufacture of Sunflower Seed Oil”
(365)
“Complete Collectivization”
(375-389)
Photo-Document:
“More liquor
to be sold” (379)
“Kurkul’s
livestock confiscated for collective farms” (383)
“Peasant’s
goods confiscated” (385)
“Victims Seek Protection from the
Government” (380-381)
Appeal written to Visti 23 September 1932
“Resistence of Famers and the Women”
(391-411)
It is important to note that the people did not just willingly submit to
their tormentors, but did try to save themselves—and this against the
overwhelming superiority of force applied against them by the government.
Photo-Documents:
“Demand for
Confidential Report on Peasant Morale” (393)
“Deprived of
franchise” (397)
“The Women Revolt” (398-403)
“The Growing Conflict between the Collective Farmers and the Government,
the Communist Party of Ukraine and the
All-Union Communist Party, and between Ukraine and Moscow” (413-429)
Photo-Document:
“Demand for
Weekly Reports on the Kurkuls” (417)
“The
Organized Preparation of the Famine” (433-470)
“The Struggle of Ukrainian Peasants for
Bread” (471-483)
“The Growing Conflict Between the
Collective Farmers and the Government, The
Communist Party of Ukraine, the All-Union Communist Party, and Between
Ukraine and Moscow” (413-429)
Photo-Documents:
“Demand for
Weekly Reports on the Kurkuls” (417)
“A Daughter of De-kurkulized Parents Works in a
Collective Farm
Under an Assumed Name” (425)
See Also reference to the diary of a kulak’s son, who decried his familial
heritage in Stalinism: New Directions
“The
Organized Preparation of the Famine” (433-470)
“Six-part Plan” (433-434)
3.
Grain
Collection
4.
Entire
Economy, even of “smallest peasant”
3.
Forbidden use of products of their labor
4. Commercial blockade
5. Passport System that confined peasantry
to their villages
See Also: “Passport System of the USSR” (458-465)
8.
Transportation Blockade—no one in; no one out.
9.
Conceal
Facts—campaign of dezinformatsia
“Anti-collective protestors same category as traitors” (441)
An especially critical factor in the ability of the peasantry to protest
Effectively, and a further example of the insidiousness of the ways in
which the law helped “legalize” their starvation.
“Guarding fields” (445-452, 581-83)
“List of Districts involved in
Commercial Blockade” (455-457)
“Molotov Orders Starvation” (469-470)
“Central Authorities [including Molotov] Witness Famine (488-494)
“Concealment of Grain and
Grindstones” (483-486)
See also: Encyclopedia of Ukraine
article about “Food Storage.”
“Mortal
Famine in the Ukrainian Village” (515-570)
“People and Horses” (516-526)
Includes regulations passed to save the lives of horses, rather than
people.
“Testimonies” (526-604)
Primary source descriptions of the Famine and its causes and effects.
“Wages and Prices of Food During the Famine” (561)
“Types of Eating Establishments” (565)
“Foraging for Food Locally in the Villages” (571-609)
“No Famine for Soviet Hogs” (573-574)
Collectivized farm hogs were fed. People ate the grain given to hogs for
feed.
“Buried
Alive” (585-587)
See also
page 20 of Woropay, Olexa. The
the Victims of the Famine of 1933.
“Poisoning” (605-606)
See also pages 3-4, The
Famine of 1933, by Olexa Woropay.
“Torgsin Stores” (606-610)
See also The Artificial Famine, 1932-1982, by Lesia Kot-Samp.
“The Suppression of the Effects of the Famine and the Strengthening of the
Collective Slave System” (681-710)
“Excerpts from Statements of Communist Party Policy Concerning the Famine”
(683-703)
“Russians Replace Unkrainian Hunger Victims”
(703-710)
The Soviet government brought in Russian settlers to repopulate those
villages
whose populations were decimated by the Famine. The work of these new
well-fed settlers accounts for increased production figures often used to
denigrate the amount of work accomplished earlier by starving peasants.
“Firing Squad Victims’ List”
(687-689)
Popovsky, Mark. The
Vavilov Affair. With a
foreword by Andrei Sakharov. Hamden,
Connecticut: Archon Books, 1983. viii + 216 pp. Portrait of Vavilov on
the front cover, Notes, Index. ISBN: 0208020357 (alk. paper); LCCN: 84-9342.
Popovsky explores the scientific side of Soviet agriculture of the time
period surrounding the Famine. Referring to Soviet Commissar for Agriculture,
Yakovlev,
he writes that Lysenko’s vernalization technique “be extended to
some 250,000 acres on state farms and to be applied extensively on the
collective farms” (59). Suspicions of kulak sabotage being responsible for the
failure of his technique, Lysenko charged, “The class enemy always remains an
enemy…” (66). The question of harvest
figures of the time has been a matter of some conjecture. Popovsky writes, “most people were
uninformed, because the true figures of the harvests in those years were kept
secret” (78). He continues:
Acadamician Konstantinov, supported Lisitsyn’s questions with hard figures. Citing
data from fifty-three plant-breeding stations in the Soviet Union that had
carried out the vernalization of wheat from 1932-1936, he reported that in half
the cases vernalization had slightly increased the yield, while in the other
half it had actually reduced it. To take such an agronomic process seriously,
he said, was to indulge in self-deception” (81).